![]() As the victim, it is your job to find the right lawyer that can defend your rights and get ample settlement compensation for the following: Medical bills Pain and suffering Loss of job or ability to work Loss of consortium etc. Stringent legal principles Due to the destructive nature of truck crashes and the high costs and damages involved, the defendant will most likely look for the most talented lawyer in the city to escape blame. ![]() The result? A long and hefty medical bill that can be easily negated by an experienced attorney with the means to get the defendant or insurance company to pay for these medical bills prior to proceeding with the case. Fractures are also common in these incidents, as well as burns, amputations, spinal cord injuries, tissue damage, etc. National Library of Medicine data shows that head and brain injuries typically set victims back by up to $401,808 in in-hospital costs. High medical bills Head and brain injuries are an all too common occurrence in truck crashes. This is why it makes sense to work with an attorney who can handle the case from A-Z, defend your rights and get you rightful compensation. Being that a fully loaded truck may weigh as much as 90,000 lbs., the sheer size and weight of these enormous vehicles are often to blame. Stakes are high Truck crashes often result in severe injury, massive property destruction, and/or the untimely death of pedestrians and other drivers. This is precisely why If you’ve been involved in an accident, working with a truck accident lawyer may be a smart move to get the compensation you deserve. Unlike car crash settlements, truck collisions have convoluted laws surrounding them as well. ![]() In fact, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration data shows that collisions that involve trucks and large commercial vehicles make up around 13% of all fatal crashes nationwide. Both of which were handled by a highly experienced lawyer. GM's majority-owned Cruise self-driving vehicle unit has been operating since 2013.įord announced it would use the name BlueCruise for its hands-free driving technology in April this year.When it comes to significant truck collision damage compensations in the U.S., it’s hard to top the $90 million settlement made toward the end of comedian Tracy Morgan’s lawsuit, or the $80 million payout for Joe Fred’s notoriously expensive court appearance. GM announced in 2012 it would use the name Super Cruise for its hands-free driver assistance technology, and has been marketing the technology using that name since 2017. "Ford's decision to rebrand by using a core mark used by GM and Cruise will inevitably cause confusion." "Ford knew what it was doing," GM said in the lawsuit. The so-called Advanced Driver Assistance Systems, such as Tesla's semi-automated Autopilot technology, are not supposed to allow drivers to fully disengage from driving for extended periods.Īutomakers have used the word, cruise, for decades to describe cruise control systems which allow drivers to set a speed the car will maintain, usually in highway driving. ![]() "That’s why BlueCruise was chosen as the name for the Blue Oval’s next evolution of Ford’s Intelligent Adaptive Cruise Control."Īutomakers are racing each other to deploy technology to enable drivers to take their hands off the steering wheel in traffic jams or on highways. "Drivers for decades have understood what cruise control is, every automaker offers it, and 'cruise' is common shorthand for the capability," Ford said in a statement. automaker has asked the court for an order to prohibit Ford from using the BlueCruise name and unspecified damages.įord called the lawsuit, filed in federal court in California, "meritless and frivolous". GM is claiming trademark infringement and unfair competition in the lawsuit. In the lawsuit, filed on Friday, GM said the automakers had held "protracted discussions" over the matter but failed to resolve the dispute. "While GM had hoped to resolve the trademark infringement matter with Ford amicably, we were left with no choice but to vigorously defend our brands and protect the equity our products and technology have earned over several years in the market," GM said in its statement. In a statement released shortly after midnight Detroit time, GM said Ford's use of the BlueCruise name infringed on GM's Super Cruise trademark, as well as Cruise's trademark. DETROIT - General Motors and its Cruise robo-taxi subsidiary have filed a lawsuit to stop Ford from using the name "BlueCruise" to market its hands-free driving technology, the companies said on Saturday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |